<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Journal title</title>
<title_fa>عنوان نشریه</title_fa>
<short_title>Technology and Research Information System</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://newresearch.medilam.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn></journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online></journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>doi</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1398</year>
	<month>2</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2019</year>
	<month>5</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>2</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>مقایسه ارتباط بین تراکم ماست سلهاو ماکروفاژها و ریز عروق خونی در انواع اسکواموس سل کارسینومای دهان و پوست</title_fa>
	<title>Association   of   mast   cells   and macrophage density with   tumor angiogenesis in various type of oral and skin    squamous   cell carcinomas</title>
	<subject_fa>عمومي</subject_fa>
	<subject>General</subject>
	<content_type_fa>مقطعی (Cross sectional)</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Cross sectional</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>Alam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:975-83.&lt;br&gt;
2. Khiavi MM, Abdal K, Abbasi MM, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparison of injectable doxorubicin &amp; its&lt;br&gt;
nanodrug complex chemotherapy for the&lt;br&gt;
treatment of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide induced&lt;br&gt;
oral squamous cell carcinoma in rats. Indian J&lt;br&gt;
Med Res 2017; 145:112.&lt;br&gt;
3. Manfredini M, Longo C, Ferrari B, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal&lt;br&gt;
microscopy features of cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol&lt;br&gt;
2017; 31:1828-33.&lt;br&gt;
4. Zaidi MA, Mallick AK. A study on assessment of&lt;br&gt;
mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann&lt;br&gt;
Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4:457&amp;ndash;60.&lt;br&gt;
5. Carlile J, Harada K, Baillie R. Vascular endothelial&lt;br&gt;
growth factor (VEGF) expression in oral tissues:&lt;br&gt;
possible relevance to angiogenesis, tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression and field cancerisation. J Oral&lt;br&gt;
Pathol Med 2013; 30:449-57.&lt;br&gt;
6. Macluskey M, Chandrachud LM, Pazouki S.&lt;br&gt;
Apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis&lt;br&gt;
in oral tissues. Possible relevance to tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression. J Pathol 2010; 191:368-75.&lt;br&gt;
7. Gudiseva S, Santosh AB, Chitturi R, et al. The role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma.&lt;br&gt;
Contemp Oncol 2017; 21:21.&lt;br&gt;
8. Cheema VS, Ramesh V, Balamurali PD. The&lt;br&gt;
relevance of mast cells in oral squamous cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6:1803-07.&lt;br&gt;
9. Conti P, Castellani ML, Kempuraj D, et al. Role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cell in tumor growth. Ann Clin Lab Sci&lt;br&gt;
2007; 37:315-22.&lt;br&gt;
10. Shivamallappa SM, Venkatraman NT, Shreedhar&lt;br&gt;
B, et al. Role of angiogenesis in oral squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma development and metastasis: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Sci 2011;&lt;br&gt;
3:216-24.&lt;br&gt;
11. Wadhwan V, Sharma P, Saxena C, et al. Grading&lt;br&gt;
angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma:&lt;br&gt;
A histomorphometric study. Indian J Dent Res&lt;br&gt;
2015; 26:26-30.&lt;br&gt;
12. Florence ME, Massuda JY, Br&amp;ouml;cker EB,&lt;br&gt;
et al. Angiogenesis in the progression of&lt;br&gt;
cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study of endothelial&lt;br&gt;
markers. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66:465-68.&lt;br&gt;
13. Dodani A, Siadati S, Salehinejad J, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparative evaluation of the frequency ofAlam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:975-83.&lt;br&gt;
2. Khiavi MM, Abdal K, Abbasi MM, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparison of injectable doxorubicin &amp; its&lt;br&gt;
nanodrug complex chemotherapy for the&lt;br&gt;
treatment of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide induced&lt;br&gt;
oral squamous cell carcinoma in rats. Indian J&lt;br&gt;
Med Res 2017; 145:112.&lt;br&gt;
3. Manfredini M, Longo C, Ferrari B, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal&lt;br&gt;
microscopy features of cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol&lt;br&gt;
2017; 31:1828-33.&lt;br&gt;
4. Zaidi MA, Mallick AK. A study on assessment of&lt;br&gt;
mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann&lt;br&gt;
Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4:457&amp;ndash;60.&lt;br&gt;
5. Carlile J, Harada K, Baillie R. Vascular endothelial&lt;br&gt;
growth factor (VEGF) expression in oral tissues:&lt;br&gt;
possible relevance to angiogenesis, tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression and field cancerisation. J Oral&lt;br&gt;
Pathol Med 2013; 30:449-57.&lt;br&gt;
6. Macluskey M, Chandrachud LM, Pazouki S.&lt;br&gt;
Apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis&lt;br&gt;
in oral tissues. Possible relevance to tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression. J Pathol 2010; 191:368-75.&lt;br&gt;
7. Gudiseva S, Santosh AB, Chitturi R, et al. The role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma.&lt;br&gt;
Contemp Oncol 2017; 21:21.&lt;br&gt;
8. Cheema VS, Ramesh V, Balamurali PD. The&lt;br&gt;
relevance of mast cells in oral squamous cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6:1803-07.&lt;br&gt;
9. Conti P, Castellani ML, Kempuraj D, et al. Role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cell in tumor growth. Ann Clin Lab Sci&lt;br&gt;
2007; 37:315-22.&lt;br&gt;
10. Shivamallappa SM, Venkatraman NT, Shreedhar&lt;br&gt;
B, et al. Role of angiogenesis in oral squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma development and metastasis: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Sci 2011;&lt;br&gt;
3:216-24.&lt;br&gt;
11. Wadhwan V, Sharma P, Saxena C, et al. Grading&lt;br&gt;
angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma:&lt;br&gt;
A histomorphometric study. Indian J Dent Res&lt;br&gt;
2015; 26:26-30.&lt;br&gt;
12. Florence ME, Massuda JY, Br&amp;ouml;cker EB,&lt;br&gt;
et al. Angiogenesis in the progression of&lt;br&gt;
cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study of endothelial&lt;br&gt;
markers. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66:465-68.&lt;br&gt;
13. Dodani A, Siadati S, Salehinejad J, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparative evaluation of the frequency ofAlam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:975-83.&lt;br&gt;
2. Khiavi MM, Abdal K, Abbasi MM, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparison of injectable doxorubicin &amp; its&lt;br&gt;
nanodrug complex chemotherapy for the&lt;br&gt;
treatment of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide induced&lt;br&gt;
oral squamous cell carcinoma in rats. Indian J&lt;br&gt;
Med Res 2017; 145:112.&lt;br&gt;
3. Manfredini M, Longo C, Ferrari B, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal&lt;br&gt;
microscopy features of cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol&lt;br&gt;
2017; 31:1828-33.&lt;br&gt;
4. Zaidi MA, Mallick AK. A study on assessment of&lt;br&gt;
mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann&lt;br&gt;
Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4:457&amp;ndash;60.&lt;br&gt;
5. Carlile J, Harada K, Baillie R. Vascular endothelial&lt;br&gt;
growth factor (VEGF) expression in oral tissues:&lt;br&gt;
possible relevance to angiogenesis, tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression and field cancerisation. J Oral&lt;br&gt;
Pathol Med 2013; 30:449-57.&lt;br&gt;
6. Macluskey M, Chandrachud LM, Pazouki S.&lt;br&gt;
Apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis&lt;br&gt;
in oral tissues. Possible relevance to tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression. J Pathol 2010; 191:368-75.&lt;br&gt;
7. Gudiseva S, Santosh AB, Chitturi R, et al. The role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma.&lt;br&gt;
Contemp Oncol 2017; 21:21.&lt;br&gt;
8. Cheema VS, Ramesh V, Balamurali PD. The&lt;br&gt;
relevance of mast cells in oral squamous cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6:1803-07.&lt;br&gt;
9. Conti P, Castellani ML, Kempuraj D, et al. Role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cell in tumor growth. Ann Clin Lab Sci&lt;br&gt;
2007; 37:315-22.&lt;br&gt;
10. Shivamallappa SM, Venkatraman NT, Shreedhar&lt;br&gt;
B, et al. Role of angiogenesis in oral squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma development and metastasis: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Sci 2011;&lt;br&gt;
3:216-24.&lt;br&gt;
11. Wadhwan V, Sharma P, Saxena C, et al. Grading&lt;br&gt;
angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma:&lt;br&gt;
A histomorphometric study. Indian J Dent Res&lt;br&gt;
2015; 26:26-30.&lt;br&gt;
12. Florence ME, Massuda JY, Br&amp;ouml;cker EB,&lt;br&gt;
et al. Angiogenesis in the progression of&lt;br&gt;
cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study of endothelial&lt;br&gt;
markers. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66:465-68.&lt;br&gt;
13. Dodani A, Siadati S, Salehinejad J, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparative evaluation of the frequency ofAlam M, Ratner D. Cutaneous squamous-cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:975-83.&lt;br&gt;
2. Khiavi MM, Abdal K, Abbasi MM, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparison of injectable doxorubicin &amp; its&lt;br&gt;
nanodrug complex chemotherapy for the&lt;br&gt;
treatment of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide induced&lt;br&gt;
oral squamous cell carcinoma in rats. Indian J&lt;br&gt;
Med Res 2017; 145:112.&lt;br&gt;
3. Manfredini M, Longo C, Ferrari B, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal&lt;br&gt;
microscopy features of cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol&lt;br&gt;
2017; 31:1828-33.&lt;br&gt;
4. Zaidi MA, Mallick AK. A study on assessment of&lt;br&gt;
mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann&lt;br&gt;
Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4:457&amp;ndash;60.&lt;br&gt;
5. Carlile J, Harada K, Baillie R. Vascular endothelial&lt;br&gt;
growth factor (VEGF) expression in oral tissues:&lt;br&gt;
possible relevance to angiogenesis, tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression and field cancerisation. J Oral&lt;br&gt;
Pathol Med 2013; 30:449-57.&lt;br&gt;
6. Macluskey M, Chandrachud LM, Pazouki S.&lt;br&gt;
Apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis&lt;br&gt;
in oral tissues. Possible relevance to tumour&lt;br&gt;
progression. J Pathol 2010; 191:368-75.&lt;br&gt;
7. Gudiseva S, Santosh AB, Chitturi R, et al. The role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma.&lt;br&gt;
Contemp Oncol 2017; 21:21.&lt;br&gt;
8. Cheema VS, Ramesh V, Balamurali PD. The&lt;br&gt;
relevance of mast cells in oral squamous cell&lt;br&gt;
carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res 2012; 6:1803-07.&lt;br&gt;
9. Conti P, Castellani ML, Kempuraj D, et al. Role&lt;br&gt;
of mast cell in tumor growth. Ann Clin Lab Sci&lt;br&gt;
2007; 37:315-22.&lt;br&gt;
10. Shivamallappa SM, Venkatraman NT, Shreedhar&lt;br&gt;
B, et al. Role of angiogenesis in oral squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma development and metastasis: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Sci 2011;&lt;br&gt;
3:216-24.&lt;br&gt;
11. Wadhwan V, Sharma P, Saxena C, et al. Grading&lt;br&gt;
angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma:&lt;br&gt;
A histomorphometric study. Indian J Dent Res&lt;br&gt;
2015; 26:26-30.&lt;br&gt;
12. Florence ME, Massuda JY, Br&amp;ouml;cker EB,&lt;br&gt;
et al. Angiogenesis in the progression of&lt;br&gt;
cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: An&lt;br&gt;
immunohistochemical study of endothelial&lt;br&gt;
markers. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2011; 66:465-68.&lt;br&gt;
13. Dodani A, Siadati S, Salehinejad J, et al.&lt;br&gt;
Comparative evaluation of the frequency of</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.Mast cells and microvessel play an important role in tumor development and progression through angiogenesis. Because of&lt;br&gt;
the more aggressive potential and poor prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared to cutaneous squamous&lt;br&gt;
cell carcinoma (CSCC), the aim of the present study was to compare of density of mast cells and microvessel between in&lt;br&gt;
oral and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In this study cross-sectional study, we performed an immuno histochemical&lt;br&gt;
analysis in 100 paraffin blocks that included 40 cases of OSCC and 40 CSCC and 20 cases of normal skin and normal oral&lt;br&gt;
mucosa. Mast cells and microvascular density were stained by mast cell tryptase and immunohistochemistry assay using&lt;br&gt;
CD34. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 16 software. There was a significant statistical correlation (*P&lt;0.05)&lt;br&gt;
between mast cell concentration and microvascular density in OSCC and CSCC compared to control groups. In OSCC the&lt;br&gt;
mast cell concentration and microvascular density were significantly higher (*P&lt;0.05) compared with the CSCC. Therefore,&lt;br&gt;
according findings present study, mast cell concentration and microvascular density may be used as a factor for detecting&lt;br&gt;
the progression, malignant potential and invasion of OSCC compared to CSCC.</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Key words: Squamous cell carcinoma, Mast cell, Microvessel, Prognosis</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://newresearch.medilam.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2346-6&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Khadijeh</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Abdal mahmoodabadi</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>خدیجه</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>ابدال محمودآبادی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>dr.faribaabdal@yahoo.com</email>
	<code>0381820424</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460071445</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology,  School of Dentistry, Ilam University of Medical sciences, Ilam, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>گروه آموزشی پاتولوژی دندان، دانشکده دندانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام، ایلام، ایران</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
